Skip to main content

The Stepford Wives (2004)

Beautiful eyes Nicole Kidman

Plot Summary: Joanna Eberhart moves to Stepford, where wives are eerily perfect. She soon discovers a dark secret behind their submissive behavior and fights to uncover the truth.

Director: Frank Oz
Producer: Scott Rudin
Screenplay: Paul Rudnick

Starring:
Nicole Kidman as Joanna Eberhart
Matthew Broderick as Walter Kresby
Bette Midler as Bobbie Markowitz
Glenn Close as Claire Wellington
Christopher Walken as Mike Wellington
Roger Bart as Roger Bannister

 Freddy's Movie Review
***SPOILER ALERT***

The Stepford Faceplant

We carry on our trip through Oz’s filmography, but this time, we crash headfirst into a flaming pile of cinematic garbage. This movie is really, really bad. So bad, it almost feels insulting, like the writers thought their audience was made up of complete dumbasses who wouldn’t notice the absolute nonsense they were trying to pass off as a plot. And I mean nonsense. Here’s what happens, so you don’t have to waste your time: At first, the movie tells you that all the women in Stepford have been secretly replaced by robots, courtesy of their evil, insecure husbands. You even see sparks flying out of one of them, and just in case you’re too fuking dense to get it, another one literally spits out dollar bills like a human ATM. (which is a terrible, terrible idea on its own). But then, near the end, the movie suddenly changes its mind and says, “Nah, actually, they’re not robots! They just have brain implants!” So, with the press of a button, they can wake up from their robotic servitude. What the actual fuk? But wait! Even after all this is explained, there’s still a full-blown body double of Nicole Kidman ready for replacement. Pick a lane, movie! This isn’t just bad writing. It’s lazy, confused, and brain-meltingly stupid.


The Characters: Who Even Cares?

The pacing is all over the place, too. Time feels like it’s moving in random bursts, and the characters are so underdeveloped I couldn’t give a shit about any of them. Also, where the fuck are all the kids? They’re all just magically erased from the story. The acting? Well, Nicole Kidman and Glenn Close are doing their best, but even they can’t save this shitshow. Matthew Broderick is just there, being a bland, useless simp with zero chemistry with Kidman. Bette Midler is annoying as hell with her over-the-top “feminist” caricature, and Jon Lovitz is not funny. And by the way,, why didn’t Lovitz chip his wife right away? She’s the most irritating one in the whole town! Chris Walken is just doing his usual weirdo schtick, but even he can’t save this mess.


The Message: Heavy-Handed and Pointless

The soundtrack is passable, but honestly, who the hell cares about the music at this point? The only moment I actually enjoyed was the Orlando Bloom joke, which got a small chuckle out of me. The beginning of the movie tricked me into thinking I might be watching something interesting, but that hope was quickly crushed into dust. And the social commentary? It sucks. Like, are we lecturing five-year-olds in 2004? Do we, men, really need to be talked down to like this? Do we all dream of turning our wives into little robots and live in terror of strong, successful women? Well, okay, some probably do, but this stupid-ass movie isn’t going to open anyone’s eyes to society’s ingrained sexism. If anything, it just insults everyone in the process. So yeah. Don’t watch this. It’s not worth your time. Probably better off watching the 1975 original, since every other critic says it’s actually good. But I wouldn’t know. I need to wash this crap-fest out of my brain before I attempt another feminist dystopia. Frank Oz, my dude, what happened? This movie hurts my soul.


πŸŽ₯ Cinematography (2/10):

Whatever.

πŸ“– Story (0/10):

Incoherent and self-contradictory.

🎬 Direction (0/10):

Completely out of control.

πŸ‘₯ Characters (2/10):

Mostly unlikable or underdeveloped.

πŸ’₯ Visual Effects (2/10):

I hate that robo-dog.

🎭 Acting (4/10):

Nicole Kidman and Glenn Close deserved a better movie.

πŸ’¬ Dialogue (1/10):

Cringe-worthy, unfunny, and simplistic.

🌍 Setting/Atmosphere (1/10):

Whatever.

🎡 Music (3/10):

Whatever.

πŸ˜„ Entertainment Value (1/10):

One or two chuckles, a frustrating watch.

Final score: 16/100

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Celebration (1998)

Plot Summary: A wealthy Danish patriarch gathers his family at his remote country hotel to celebrate his 60th birthday. His eldest son, Christian, uses the celebratory toast to drop a bomb: a public accusation of childhood sexual abuse. The family proceeds to completely implode. Danish Title: Festen Director: Thomas Vinterberg (uncredited, per the rules of Dogme 95) Writers: Thomas Vinterberg, Mogens Rukov Cinematography: Anthony Dod Mantle Editing: ValdΓ­s Γ“skarsdΓ³ttir Music: Lars Bo Jensen Starring: Ulrich Thomsen as Christian Klingenfeldt-Hansen Henning Moritzen as Helge, Christian's father Thomas Bo Larsen as Michael, Christian's brother Paprika Steen as Helene, Christian's sister Birthe Neumann as Else, Christian's mother Trine Dyrholm as Pia, the waiter close to Christian   ⚠️ SPOILER ALERT ⚠️ A 9...

After Yang (2021)

After Yang is a 2021 American science fiction drama film adaptation written, directed, and edited by Kogonada. It stars Colin Farrell, Jodie Turner-Smith, Justin H. Min, Malea Emma Tjandrawidjaja, and Haley Lu Richardson. The film had its world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival on July 8, 2021 before having its North American premiere on January 21, 2022 at the Sundance Film Festival, where it won the Alfred P. Sloan Prize. source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Yang In a near future, a family reckons with questions of love, connection, and loss after their A.I. helper unexpectedly breaks down. source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8633464/ ***SPOILER ALERT*** A Melancholic and Thought-Provoking AI Drama F: Hello dear readers! Our second movie of the week is"After Yang", a thought-provoking and emotional film set in a peaceful and harmonious future society. It follows Jake as he struggles with the decommissioning of his adopt...

The Idiots (1998)

Plot Summary: A group of able-bodied adults living in a commune on the outskirts of Copenhagen spend their days pretending to be mentally disabled in public, a practice they call "spazzing." When a quiet, reserved woman named Karen wanders into their world, the group's provocations begin to unravel into something far more raw and devastating. Danish Title: Idioterne Director: Lars von Trier (uncredited; under Dogme 95 rules) Writer: Lars von Trier Producer: Vibeke WindelΓΈv Starring: Bodil JΓΈrgensen as Karen Jens Albinus as Stoffer Anne Louise Hassing as Susanne Troels Lyby as Henrik Nikolaj Lie Kaas as Jeppe Louise Mieritz as Josephine Henrik Prip as Ped   ⚠️ SPOILER ALERT ⚠️ Diving into the Dogma (and the Depravity) Hello dear reader! Today I found some time to write a review on last night's movie, The Idiots (1998...

Sentimental Value (2025)

Plot Summary: A film director wants to make a movie. His family has feelings about it. Two hours and thirteen minutes pass. Acclaimed by everyone except me. Norwegian Title: Affeksjonsverdi Director: Joachim Trier Writers: Eskil Vogt, Joachim Trier Producers: Maria Ekerhovd, Andrea Berentsen Ottmar Cinematography: Kasper Tuxen Editing: Olivier Bugge CouttΓ© Music: Hania Rani Starring: Renate Reinsve as Nora Borg Stellan SkarsgΓ₯rd as Gustav Borg Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas as Agnes Borg Pettersen Elle Fanning as Rachel Kemp Anders Danielsen Lie as Jakob Jesper Christensen as Michael   ⚠️ SPOILER ALERT ⚠️ A Universally Acclaimed Snoozefest Today I bring you the movie... let me check my notes again. Ah, right: Sentimental Value. What a boooooring movie. That's it, thank you for reading. But seriously, le...

Kung Fu Hustle (2004)

Plot Summary: In 1940s Shanghai, a wannabe gangster named Sing aspires to join the notorious Axe Gang. His bungled attempt to extort the residents of Pig Sty Alley inadvertently leads to a gang war that gradually reveals surprising martial arts masters hiding among the slum's humble residents. Directors: Stephen Chow Writers: Stephen Chow, Huo Xin, Chan Man-keung, Tsang Kan-cheung Story by: Stephen Chow Cinematography: Poon Hang-sang Edited by: Angie Lam Music by: Raymond Wong Starring: Stephen Chow as Sing Danny Chan as Brother Sum Yuen Qiu as Landlady Yuen Wah as Landlord Leung Siu-lung as Beast Xing Yu as Coolie Chiu Chi-ling as Tailor Dong Zhihua as Donut Lam Chi-chung as Bone Huang Shengyi as Fong Tin Kai-man as Adviser Gar Hong-hay and Fung Hak-on as Harpists Introduction: A ...

The Gambler (1974)

The Gambler is a 1974 American crime drama film written by James Toback and directed by Karel Reisz. It stars James Caan, Paul Sorvino and Lauren Hutton. Caan's performance was widely lauded and was nominated for a Golden Globe. Some see the film as a loose adaptation of the short 1866 novel The Gambler by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gambler_(1974_film) Axel Freed is a literature professor. He has the gambling vice. When he has lost all of his money, he borrows from his girlfriend, then his mother, and finally some bad guys that chase him. Despite all of this, he cannot stop gambling. source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071532/ ***SPOILER ALERT*** A Sharp Character Study of Self-Destruction KRASNAYA: Fourth in line in our tribute to James Caan is The Gambler, a 1974 crime drama filmed by Karel Reisz. The screenplay for the film was written by James Toback. He wrote his own story...