Skip to main content

The Stepford Wives (2004)

Beautiful eyes Nicole Kidman

Plot Summary: Joanna Eberhart moves to Stepford, where wives are eerily perfect. She soon discovers a dark secret behind their submissive behavior and fights to uncover the truth.

Director: Frank Oz
Producer: Scott Rudin
Screenplay: Paul Rudnick

Starring:
Nicole Kidman as Joanna Eberhart
Matthew Broderick as Walter Kresby
Bette Midler as Bobbie Markowitz
Glenn Close as Claire Wellington
Christopher Walken as Mike Wellington
Roger Bart as Roger Bannister

 Freddy's Movie Review
***SPOILER ALERT***

The Stepford Faceplant

We carry on our trip through Oz’s filmography, but this time, we crash headfirst into a flaming pile of cinematic garbage. This movie is really, really bad. So bad, it almost feels insulting, like the writers thought their audience was made up of complete dumbasses who wouldn’t notice the absolute nonsense they were trying to pass off as a plot. And I mean nonsense. Here’s what happens, so you don’t have to waste your time: At first, the movie tells you that all the women in Stepford have been secretly replaced by robots, courtesy of their evil, insecure husbands. You even see sparks flying out of one of them, and just in case you’re too fuking dense to get it, another one literally spits out dollar bills like a human ATM. (which is a terrible, terrible idea on its own). But then, near the end, the movie suddenly changes its mind and says, “Nah, actually, they’re not robots! They just have brain implants!” So, with the press of a button, they can wake up from their robotic servitude. What the actual fuk? But wait! Even after all this is explained, there’s still a full-blown body double of Nicole Kidman ready for replacement. Pick a lane, movie! This isn’t just bad writing. It’s lazy, confused, and brain-meltingly stupid.


The Characters: Who Even Cares?

The pacing is all over the place, too. Time feels like it’s moving in random bursts, and the characters are so underdeveloped I couldn’t give a shit about any of them. Also, where the fuck are all the kids? They’re all just magically erased from the story. The acting? Well, Nicole Kidman and Glenn Close are doing their best, but even they can’t save this shitshow. Matthew Broderick is just there, being a bland, useless simp with zero chemistry with Kidman. Bette Midler is annoying as hell with her over-the-top “feminist” caricature, and Jon Lovitz is not funny. And by the way,, why didn’t Lovitz chip his wife right away? She’s the most irritating one in the whole town! Chris Walken is just doing his usual weirdo schtick, but even he can’t save this mess.


The Message: Heavy-Handed and Pointless

The soundtrack is passable, but honestly, who the hell cares about the music at this point? The only moment I actually enjoyed was the Orlando Bloom joke, which got a small chuckle out of me. The beginning of the movie tricked me into thinking I might be watching something interesting, but that hope was quickly crushed into dust. And the social commentary? It sucks. Like, are we lecturing five-year-olds in 2004? Do we, men, really need to be talked down to like this? Do we all dream of turning our wives into little robots and live in terror of strong, successful women? Well, okay, some probably do, but this stupid-ass movie isn’t going to open anyone’s eyes to society’s ingrained sexism. If anything, it just insults everyone in the process. So yeah. Don’t watch this. It’s not worth your time. Probably better off watching the 1975 original, since every other critic says it’s actually good. But I wouldn’t know. I need to wash this crap-fest out of my brain before I attempt another feminist dystopia. Frank Oz, my dude, what happened? This movie hurts my soul.


๐ŸŽฅ Cinematography (2/10):

Whatever.

๐Ÿ“– Story (0/10):

Incoherent and self-contradictory.

๐ŸŽฌ Direction (0/10):

Completely out of control.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Characters (2/10):

Mostly unlikable or underdeveloped.

๐Ÿ’ฅ Visual Effects (2/10):

I hate that robo-dog.

๐ŸŽญ Acting (4/10):

Nicole Kidman and Glenn Close deserved a better movie.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Dialogue (1/10):

Cringe-worthy, unfunny, and simplistic.

๐ŸŒ Setting/Atmosphere (1/10):

Whatever.

๐ŸŽต Music (3/10):

Whatever.

๐Ÿ˜„ Entertainment Value (1/10):

One or two chuckles, a frustrating watch.

Final score: 16/100
Our blog is currently being updated regularly!

Comments

๐ŸŽฌ Join the CineIt Movie Club!

Get exclusive reviews and recommendations delivered straight to your inbox. Never miss a great movie again!

Popular posts from this blog

Frank Oz: From Worst to Best

I've finished my Frank Oz filmography a while back and hadn't had the time to post here the rank and some thoughts about his work. Let's try to refresh my memory and give you some of my opinions... man. Frank Oz is a true legend. At 81, he's not just a brilliant filmmaker but also a puppeteer and writer whose characters, from the Muppets to Sesame Street, have touched countless lives. His directing career is full of outstanding, entertaining movies; out of 14 films, there's really only one rotten apple in the bunch. I'm not sure if he's planning to make any more movies, but I'd love to see him try his hand at a serious drama, just to see him flex a different creative muscle. I wouldn't like to be that famous, I value my privacy. Mind you, Miss Piggy enjoys every moment of it. If it were not for me, she would spend all her time in the limelight. Frank OZ This is his entire fi...

The Life of Chuck (2024)

Plot Summary: Told in three acts moving backward in time, the film chronicles the life of Charles 'Chuck' Krantz. It begins with his death at age 39, which coincides with apocalyptic events, and moves back to his childhood in a supposedly haunted house, exploring the universe contained within a single life. Director: Mike Flanagan Screenplay: Mike Flanagan (based on the novella by Stephen King) Producers: Trevor Macy, Mike Flanagan Music: The Newton Brothers Cinematography: Eben Bolter Editor:   Mike Flanagan Starring: Tom Hiddleston as Charles Krantz Mark Hamill as Albie Chiwetel Ejiofor as Marty Anderson Karen Gillan as Felicia Gordon Jacob Tremblay as Young Charles Krantz   ***SPOILER ALERT*** Let me start with wtf is wrong with people... After a quick trip to the IMDb page for The Life of Chuck, I have one thi...

The Wandering Earth (2019)

Plot Summary: Set in a future where the sun is dying, humanity builds enormous engines to propel Earth out of the solar system toward a new star. When Earth passes Jupiter, a gravitational spike threatens the planet, and a group of heroes must race against time to restart a failed engine and save humanity from extinction. Director: Frant Gwo Screenplay: Gong Geer, Frant Gwo, Junce Ye, Yan Dongxu, Yang Zhixue, Ruchang Ye (based on the novella by Liu Cixin) Music: Roc Chen, Liu Tao Cinematography: Michael Liu Starring: Qu Chuxiao as Liu Qi Li Guangjie as Wang Lei Ng Man-tat as Han Zi'ang Zhao Jinmai as Han Duoduo Wu Jing as Liu Peiqiang   ***SPOILER ALERT*** A Belated Promise and a Grand Premise A few months ago, I promised my friends on the Chinese social media app Red Note that I'd review some Chinese movies. Unlike other platforms whe...

Freaky Tales (2024)

Plot Summary: Set against the vibrant and chaotic backdrop of Oakland, California, in 1987, Freaky Tales weaves together four interconnected stories inspired by the city's culture from that era. Narrated by Oakland rap legend Too Short, the film unfolds over a single day and night, following a diverse group of characters on a collision course. Directors: Ryan Fleck, Anna Boden Screenplay: Ryan Fleck, Anna Boden Music: Raphael Saadiq Cinematography: Jac Fitzgerald Starring: Pedro Pascal as Clint Ben Mendelsohn as The Guy Jay Ellis as Sleepy Floyd Dominique Thorne as Barbie Normani as Entice   ***SPOILER ALERT*** Dude, I Think I'm Too Old For This So I decided to check out a popular new movie, and dude... I think I'm too old for this sh**. The film is set in 1987 and uses all the camera tricks and cinematography to go for that '...

Top 5 - Luc Besson

Hey everyone, and welcome back! While I've been posting regularly, it took me a little while to wrap up my thoughts on Luc Besson's filmography and put together this top 5 video. It's been 384 days since my last post on this topic, so I know this video is long overdue, but I hope you'll agree that it was worth the wait! Video Format: For the Visual Film Lovers For those who prefer watching over reading, this video is an easy-to-digest introduction to Luc Besson's movies. I've been wrestling with how to present my thoughts on a director whose career, for me, went from "Cinรฉma du look" to "cinema don't look." I apologize for the monotonous AI voice in the video; I'm just not that comfortable speaking English with my accent just yet. But...

The Surfer (2024)

Plot Summary: A father and son arrive at a remote beach for a surfing vacation, but are met with hostility from the territorial locals. As the father attempts to prove himself worthy of surfing the beach, he descends into an increasingly surreal and menacing experience that challenges his sanity and physical limits. Director: Lorcan Finnegan Screenplay: Thomas Martin Music: Franรงois Tรฉtaz Cinematography: Radek ลadczuk Starring: Nicolas Cage as The Surfer Julian McMahon as Scally Nicholas Cassim as The Son   ***SPOILER ALERT*** Welcome to the Church of Cage Someone once said that "Nicolas Cage" is its own movie genre, and I couldn't agree more. I specifically chose to watch The Surfer because I was in desperate need of a fix, and this film, directed by Lorcan Finnegan, couldn't have been a more perfect vehicle for him. One of the absolute...